Skip to main content

DODGE TOMAHAWK: THE MONSTER THAT NEVER WAS


 It’s 2003, and crazy uncle Chrysler had what seemed like a fantastic idea, but it really wasn’t… 

By Mat

Fiat and Chrysler were made for each other. Fiat possessed oodles of Italian heritage and passion, while Chrysler was the Gerry Brownlee of American automotive companies.  
The combination of the two was always going to create a noisy company that isn’t afraid to throw its weight around and let you know about it. These days it seems a month doesn’t go by without some kooky new idea from “out-there” FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne making the rounds. But wind back the clock to the turn of the century and we can see Chrysler was already pretty out-there. And here’s why; they thought the Dodge Tomahawk was a good idea. 

For those who aren’t in the know, the Dodge Tomahawk was what turn of the century Americans, well, Americans in general, have always thought was everything they needed. Introduced at the 2003 North American International Motor Show in Detroit, the Tomahawk was the epitome of American motoring ideals: an incredibly unnecessarily large engine thrown into a small platform where normal rules like fuel economy, comfort, and ability to go around a corner with ease were thrown out the window 

With the infamous Dodge Viper’s 372kW 8.3-litre V10 at its heart, the Tomahawk looked futuristic but at the same time and in nearly every way it was completely and utterly awful. 

This is what Dodge had to say at the time of release:  

The Viper-powered Dodge Tomahawk concept vehicle shatters all the barriers of conventional thinking about personal transportation. This four-wheel, single-passenger vehicle is a sleek, rolling sculpture that combines art-deco styling with extreme engineering. 

Umm, art-deco styling? I don't know about you but I look at it and think "dystopian future where the machines rule the earth" and not art-deco as seen in Napier. 

I’m not sure what the “barriers of conventional thinking” they were referring to might be either, but taking one look at the Tomahawk would suggest that any reasonable form of vehicle practicality is probably the conventional thinking barrier they thought they were “shattering” 

Just look at the thing! It is monstrously large, weighing in at laughable 680kg. Let's put that in perspective. The Peel P40, another single person transport, weighed in at just 56kg. That means you would need 12 of the things to tip a see saw with the Tomahawk.   
It seems fuel range wasn't a consideration either, with just a 12.3-litre fuel tank to provide for the thirsty big V10. Then of course there is the bulbousdystopian styling that enhances the enormity of the thing’s size.  Who in their right mind would think people would want to look at this shiny monstrosity 

Well, apparently crazy uncle Chrysler did, and so did a small number of Dodge nuts who paid upwards of half a million dollars for one of nine replicas built. 

"Tomahawk is an icon of the extreme thinking for a brand that is known not only for the legendary Viper and Ram, but also for all new, innovative vehicles such as the Magnum SRT-8 and Durango concepts," said Trevor Creed, Chrysler Group’s Senior Vice President of Design at the time. 

To give them the benefit of the doubt, Creed did sort-of have a good point. It was extreme, and it did offer a few innovations rarely seen before it. 
 
For instance, the Tomahawk had two front wheels and two rear wheels, which were sprung independently and theoretically allowed it to lean into corners and countersteer just like a regular motorcycle. 

There was also lighting provided by LEDs, a digital dash and radially mounted brake rotors on the huge 20-inch wheels each clamped by 4-pot calipers. The whole thing was made from billet aluminium, including the monococque and crafty swing arms, but it is still hard to get past the fact Dodge called it “a sculpture that can be ridden”. 

With a claimed (and thoroughly impossible to achieve) top speed of over 482kmhand a promise to put it to the test at the Bonneville Salt Flats which never was fulfilled, the Dodge Tomahawk was a bonkers concept vehicle that while achieving its intended goal of creating media buzz, was an utter failure in terms of rewarding Chrysler for the R&D that must have gone into creating it. 

It’s a good thing the world is full of clever folks willing to build on terrible ideas like the Tomahawk and make them actually work. In a way, we can actually thank the sick minds behind the Tomahawk for the inspiration for French-Swiss custom shop Lazereth’s quite stunning LM847, which uses the same four-wheel design principles along with a monster car engine as its heart – a 350kW Maserati F136Y V8 built by, you guess it, Fiat Chrysler. 

Maybe it wasn't such a terrible idea after all?  
Who am I kidding. What ever way you slice it, the Dodge Tomahawk will always be one of the most awful creations to ever scurry out from under an auto show cover. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maxxis Bravo AT 771 Review

Watch the 3-year ownership review on Youtube! I've owned a set of Maxxis' Bravo AT771 tyres for 3 years now, so I thought I'd share my thoughts on them. Firstly, I didn't buy these tyres after doing any research on them. Truth be told, I'd never even heard of Maxxis before buying these! But with the stipulation that I wanted a set of All Terrain tyres for my Forester in 215/65R16, and that I didn't want to pay over $1500 for them. I ended up paying $1000 fitted and balanced. I took a punt on the 'Mackies' as I've started to call them, and I've got to be honest, I've been pretty happy with them. Sure, they don't look as cool as other All Terrain models out there, but they've worn well and haven't given me any headaches in the 3 years I've had them. The Good Stuff The AT771s have proven to be a really good match for the Subaru in the sand, which is primarily where they've been used apart from highw...

#RoadTest: 2015 Aprilia ETX-150 review

With the introduction of the Learner Approved Motorcycles Scheme (LAMS) in 2012, new riders have far more choice in bikes than ever before. But has that extra variety and choice come at the cost of incredibly fun and thrifty, smaller capacity bikes? I’m not sure about the statistics, but in my own anecdotal view, it has. While I’ve noticed more people in my social circle taking up riding, not one has started with a sub 250cc motorcycle, even when their commuting needs don’t require the power and torque of a mid-sized bike. As a result, I’ve come to the conclusion that small capacity commuters are seriously underrated in terms of fun and ability. Jumping on the Aprilia ETX-150 for the first time I, like many, made a judgement about how the little Aprilia would ride based solely on the bike’s capacity. That 150 printed on the side cowling, in my mind, meant ‘no fun, gutless, and boring’. How wrong I was… The first thing you notice with the ETX-150 is not the size of the engine b...